Complaint
Allegations0 substantiated · 3 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded
No deficiencies recorded in this reportMKS QUALITY CARE LLC
317 NATOMA ST., Folsom CA 95630
15 bedsLatest official report Jun 15, 2026Licensed
Additional info
- Telephone
- (916) 831-7972
- Licensee
- MKS QUALITY CARE LLC
- Administrator
- LEE, KEVIN
- Contact
- LEE, KEVIN
- License first date
- Jun 7, 2021
- License effective date
- Jun 7, 2021
- District office
- SACRAMENTO NORTH ASC · (916) 263-4700
- Regional office
- 59
- Clients served
- 935 - ELDERLY
Summary
The available records show 6 Type A and 3 Type B deficiencies for this facility.
- Most recent inspection
- Jun 15, 2026
- Most recent deficiency
- Oct 2, 2025
1 later report, on Jun 15, 2026, recorded no deficiencies, though the records do not say whether they were follow-ups.
What Type A and Type B mean
- Type A
- Violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.
- Type B
- Violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.
Both classifications are published by California CDSS and are shown as published. SeniorLivingFacts does not rename them or add a severity level of its own.
At a glance
Counts cover the five-year public record. Typical figures are the median for the 17 Sacramento County facilities licensed for 7 to 15 beds, except where too few exist to state one — those come from facilities with 7 or more beds.
In the available public five-year record, CCLD published 17 reports for this facility: 12 inspections, 5 complaint investigations, and 0 licensing or administrative records.
Those records contain 6 Type A and 3 Type B deficiencies.
0 deficiencies have explicit official correction or clearance evidence in the loaded records.
- Official inspections
- 12
- Recorded deficiencies
- 9
- Type A deficiencies
- 6
- Type B deficiencies
- 3
- Substantiated complaints
- 1
- Repeated topics
- 0
More than the typical 10
2 in the last 12 months
More than the typical 8
3 in the last 12 months
More than the typical 4
1 in the last 12 months
Fewer than the typical 4
2 in the last 12 months
Fewer than the typical 2
0 in the last 12 months
Last 36 months
Repeated topics
Topics cited in more than one report during the last 36 months. A repeat may show a pattern worth asking about. Each date opens its report below.
No topic repeats in the last 36 months
No deficiency topic appears in more than one report during that window. This does not establish that nothing repeated earlier in the five-year record, and it is not a statement about current conditions.
Official report history
All preserved reports from the most recent to the oldest, sortable by report type.
Complaint
Allegations0 substantiated · 3 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded
No deficiencies recorded in this reportComplaint
Allegations0 substantiated · 1 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded
No deficiencies recorded in this reportComplaint
Allegations2 substantiated · 3 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded · 2 cited · investigated over 2 visits
Admission, assessment, and evictionType B
- Official classification
- Type B
- Official code
- 1569.651(i)(1)
- Regulation authority
- HSC
What the official deficiency says
Preadmission fee or deposit for elderly at residential care facilities; written statement describing costs and stating whether fee is refundable; conditions for refund; refund rate schedules. Notwithstanding subdivision (g), if a resident is evicted by a facility pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1569.682, the resident or the resident's legal representative shall be entitled to a refund of preadmission fees in excess of five hundred dollars ($500) in accordance with all the following. This was not evidenced by: Manager admitted she did not refund per the schedule. This is a potential risk to resident
Official plan of correction
By 05/20/2022, the licensee shall submit in writing how they are going to ensure they are going to follow the refund policy per the health and safety code regarding pre-admission fees.
Deadline recorded: May 20, 2022. A deadline is not proof that correction was completed.
Plan of correction recorded
Correction deadline recordedDeadline May 20, 2022
Correction not verified in available records
Complaint
Part of the complaint whose outcome is recorded on Apr 21, 2022 · Control 25-AS-20211118152214
Resident rightsType A
- Official classification
- Type A
- Official code
- 87468.1(a)(1)
- Regulation authority
- CCR
What the official deficiency says
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This was not met as evidenced by: a caregiver admitted she didn't close the door one time when a resident had to be changed. This poses an immedate risk to residents.
Official plan of correction
By 04/14/2022, Licensee shall at mimimum schedule resident personal rights' training for all staff and submit the training schedule to Licensing.
Deadline recorded: Apr 14, 2022. A deadline is not proof that correction was completed.
Plan of correction recorded
Correction deadline recordedDeadline Apr 14, 2022
Correction not verified in available records
Source and limits
California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. Public facility history is described by the source as a five-year window. Older records and previous-licensee history may require a regional-office request. Type 741 RCFE-CCRCs, nursing homes, and other care settings are excluded from this page.
Read the data methodology