LOVING-KINDNESS CAREHOME LLC

912 OAK RIDGE DR, Roseville CA 95661

Facility 315002925 · RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY (740)

6 bedsLatest official report Dec 12, 2025Licensed

Additional info
Licensee
LOVING-KINDNESS CAREHOME LLC
Administrator
NINOBLA, DERBBIE
Contact
NINOBLA, DERBBIE
License first date
Dec 6, 2022
License effective date
Dec 6, 2022
District office
SACRAMENTO NORTH ASC · (916) 263-4700
Regional office
59
Clients served
935 - ELDERLY, 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA, 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

Summary

The available records show 1 Type B deficiency for this facility.

Most recent inspection
Dec 12, 2025
Most recent deficiency
Nov 15, 2023

3 later reports, from Oct 14, 2024 through Dec 12, 2025, recorded no deficiencies, though the records do not say whether they were follow-ups.

What Type A and Type B mean
Type A
Violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.
Type B
Violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.

Both classifications are published by California CDSS and are shown as published. SeniorLivingFacts does not rename them or add a severity level of its own.

At a glance

Counts cover the five-year public record. Typical figures are the median for the 205 Placer County facilities licensed for 6 or fewer beds.

In the available public five-year record, CCLD published 10 reports for this facility: 6 inspections, 2 complaint investigations, and 2 licensing or administrative records.

Those records contain 0 Type A and 1 Type B deficiencies.

0 deficiencies have explicit official correction or clearance evidence in the loaded records.

Official inspections
6

More than the typical 5

1 in the last 12 months

Recorded deficiencies
1

Most this size have none

0 in the last 12 months

Type A deficiencies
0

Most this size also have none

0 in the last 12 months

Type B deficiencies
1

Most this size have none

0 in the last 12 months

Substantiated complaints
0

Most this size also have none

0 in the last 12 months

Repeated topics
0

Last 36 months

Repeated topics

Topics cited in more than one report during the last 36 months. A repeat may show a pattern worth asking about. Each date opens its report below.

No topic repeats in the last 36 months

No deficiency topic appears in more than one report during that window. This does not establish that nothing repeated earlier in the five-year record, and it is not a statement about current conditions.

Official report history

All preserved reports from the most recent to the oldest, sortable by report type.

Inspection
Admission, assessment, and evictionType B
Official classification
Type B
Official code
87507(d)
Regulation authority
CCR

What the official deficiency says

(d) The licensee shall retain in the resident's file the original signed and dated admission agreement and all subsequent signed and dated modifications. This does not apply to rate increases which have specific notification requirements as specified in Health and Safety Code section 1569.655. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Deficient Practice Statement Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 out of 4 residents did not have completed admission agreement which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Official plan of correction

POC Due Date: 11/22/2023 Plan of Correction Administrator agrees to submit completed admission agreement to CCL for review by POC due date, 11/22/2023.

Plan of correction recorded
Correction not verified in available records
View official report

Source and limits

California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. Public facility history is described by the source as a five-year window. Older records and previous-licensee history may require a regional-office request. Type 741 RCFE-CCRCs, nursing homes, and other care settings are excluded from this page.

Read the data methodology