Allegations0 substantiated · 0 unsubstantiated · 1 unfounded
No deficiencies recorded in this reportCROWN POINT VILLA
1001 TAMARACK COURT, Roseville CA 95661
6 bedsLatest official report May 15, 2026Licensed
Additional info
- Telephone
- (301) 541-4028
- Licensee
- CROWN POINT VILLA INC
- Administrator
- NABUGO, EDITH
- Contact
- NABUGO, EDITH
- License first date
- Jan 11, 2022
- License effective date
- Jan 11, 2022
- District office
- SACRAMENTO NORTH ASC · (916) 263-4700
- Regional office
- 59
- Clients served
- 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
Summary
The available records show 1 Type A and 1 Type B deficiencies for this facility.
- Most recent inspection
- Jan 21, 2026
- Most recent deficiency
- Dec 14, 2023
6 later reports, from Jan 24, 2024 through May 15, 2026, recorded no deficiencies, though the records do not say whether they were follow-ups.
What Type A and Type B mean
- Type A
- Violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.
- Type B
- Violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.
Both classifications are published by California CDSS and are shown as published. SeniorLivingFacts does not rename them or add a severity level of its own.
At a glance
Counts cover the five-year public record. Typical figures are the median for the 205 Placer County facilities licensed for 6 or fewer beds.
In the available public five-year record, CCLD published 13 reports for this facility: 7 inspections, 5 complaint investigations, and 1 licensing or administrative record.
Those records contain 1 Type A and 1 Type B deficiencies.
0 deficiencies have explicit official correction or clearance evidence in the loaded records.
- Official inspections
- 7
- Recorded deficiencies
- 2
- Type A deficiencies
- 1
- Type B deficiencies
- 1
- Substantiated complaints
- 1
- Repeated topics
- 0
More than the typical 5
1 in the last 12 months
Most this size have none
0 in the last 12 months
Most this size have none
0 in the last 12 months
Most this size have none
0 in the last 12 months
Most this size have none
0 in the last 12 months
Last 36 months
Repeated topics
Topics cited in more than one report during the last 36 months. A repeat may show a pattern worth asking about. Each date opens its report below.
No topic repeats in the last 36 months
No deficiency topic appears in more than one report during that window. This does not establish that nothing repeated earlier in the five-year record, and it is not a statement about current conditions.
Official report history
All preserved reports from the most recent to the oldest, sortable by report type.
Allegations0 substantiated · 1 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded
No deficiencies recorded in this reportAllegations1 substantiated · 1 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded · 1 cited
Admission, assessment, and evictionType B
- Official classification
- Type B
- Official code
- 1569.651(h)(2)
- Regulation authority
- HSC
What the official deficiency says
1569.651 Preadmission fee or deposit for elderly at residential care facilities; written statement describing costs and stating whether fee is refundable; conditions for refund ... If the resident leaves the facility for any reason during the first month of residency, the resident shall be entitled to a refund of at least 80 percent of the preadmission fee amount in excess of five hundred dollars ($500). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the facility did not refund R1’s RP after R1 relocated to a different facility during the first month of residency. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.
Official plan of correction
Administrator agrees to refund R1's RP $400.00 A copy of the check is to be submitted to CCL for review by POC due date, 12/21/2023.
Deadline recorded: Dec 21, 2023. A deadline is not proof that correction was completed.
Allegations0 substantiated · 2 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded
No deficiencies recorded in this reportAllegations0 substantiated · 4 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded
No deficiencies recorded in this reportBackground checksType A
- Official classification
- Type A
- Official code
- 87355(e)(1)
- Regulation authority
- CCR
What the official deficiency says
87355 Criminal Record Clearance. All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, records review, and interviews, S1 is not associated to the facility on Guardidan and LIS. Administrator stated S1 has provided care and supervision to residents in care.
Official plan of correction
Administrator agrees to have caregiver associated to the facility. Adminsitrator is to send into CCL their plan of ensuring all staff to be associated and fingerprint cleared.
Deadline recorded: Dec 2, 2022. A deadline is not proof that correction was completed.
Source and limits
California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. Public facility history is described by the source as a five-year window. Older records and previous-licensee history may require a regional-office request. Type 741 RCFE-CCRCs, nursing homes, and other care settings are excluded from this page.
Read the data methodology