CROWN POINT VILLA

1001 TAMARACK COURT, Roseville CA 95661

Facility 315002837 · RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY (740)

6 bedsLatest official report May 15, 2026Licensed

Additional info
Licensee
CROWN POINT VILLA INC
Administrator
NABUGO, EDITH
Contact
NABUGO, EDITH
License first date
Jan 11, 2022
License effective date
Jan 11, 2022
District office
SACRAMENTO NORTH ASC · (916) 263-4700
Regional office
59
Clients served
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

Summary

The available records show 1 Type A and 1 Type B deficiencies for this facility.

Most recent inspection
Jan 21, 2026
Most recent deficiency
Dec 14, 2023

6 later reports, from Jan 24, 2024 through May 15, 2026, recorded no deficiencies, though the records do not say whether they were follow-ups.

What Type A and Type B mean
Type A
Violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.
Type B
Violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.

Both classifications are published by California CDSS and are shown as published. SeniorLivingFacts does not rename them or add a severity level of its own.

At a glance

Counts cover the five-year public record. Typical figures are the median for the 205 Placer County facilities licensed for 6 or fewer beds.

In the available public five-year record, CCLD published 13 reports for this facility: 7 inspections, 5 complaint investigations, and 1 licensing or administrative record.

Those records contain 1 Type A and 1 Type B deficiencies.

0 deficiencies have explicit official correction or clearance evidence in the loaded records.

Official inspections
7

More than the typical 5

1 in the last 12 months

Recorded deficiencies
2

Most this size have none

0 in the last 12 months

Type A deficiencies
1

Most this size have none

0 in the last 12 months

Type B deficiencies
1

Most this size have none

0 in the last 12 months

Substantiated complaints
1

Most this size have none

0 in the last 12 months

Repeated topics
0

Last 36 months

Repeated topics

Topics cited in more than one report during the last 36 months. A repeat may show a pattern worth asking about. Each date opens its report below.

No topic repeats in the last 36 months

No deficiency topic appears in more than one report during that window. This does not establish that nothing repeated earlier in the five-year record, and it is not a statement about current conditions.

Official report history

All preserved reports from the most recent to the oldest, sortable by report type.

Complaint

Allegations0 substantiated · 0 unsubstantiated · 1 unfounded

No deficiencies recorded in this report
Complaint

Allegations0 substantiated · 1 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded

No deficiencies recorded in this report
Complaint

Allegations1 substantiated · 1 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded · 1 cited

Admission, assessment, and evictionType B
Official classification
Type B
Official code
1569.651(h)(2)
Regulation authority
HSC

What the official deficiency says

1569.651 Preadmission fee or deposit for elderly at residential care facilities; written statement describing costs and stating whether fee is refundable; conditions for refund ... If the resident leaves the facility for any reason during the first month of residency, the resident shall be entitled to a refund of at least 80 percent of the preadmission fee amount in excess of five hundred dollars ($500). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the facility did not refund R1’s RP after R1 relocated to a different facility during the first month of residency. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

Official plan of correction

Administrator agrees to refund R1's RP $400.00 A copy of the check is to be submitted to CCL for review by POC due date, 12/21/2023.

Deadline recorded: Dec 21, 2023. A deadline is not proof that correction was completed.

Plan of correction recorded
Correction deadline recordedDeadline Dec 21, 2023
Correction not verified in available records
View official report
Complaint

Allegations0 substantiated · 2 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded

No deficiencies recorded in this report
Complaint

Allegations0 substantiated · 4 unsubstantiated · 0 unfounded

No deficiencies recorded in this report
Inspection
Background checksType A
Official classification
Type A
Official code
87355(e)(1)
Regulation authority
CCR

What the official deficiency says

87355 Criminal Record Clearance. All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, records review, and interviews, S1 is not associated to the facility on Guardidan and LIS. Administrator stated S1 has provided care and supervision to residents in care.

Official plan of correction

Administrator agrees to have caregiver associated to the facility. Adminsitrator is to send into CCL their plan of ensuring all staff to be associated and fingerprint cleared.

Deadline recorded: Dec 2, 2022. A deadline is not proof that correction was completed.

Plan of correction recorded
Correction deadline recordedDeadline Dec 2, 2022
Correction not verified in available records
View official report
Licensing recordNot an inspection of the operating facility
No deficiencies recorded in this report

Source and limits

California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. Public facility history is described by the source as a five-year window. Older records and previous-licensee history may require a regional-office request. Type 741 RCFE-CCRCs, nursing homes, and other care settings are excluded from this page.

Read the data methodology