MEADOW SPRINGS

6013 FRIANT DRIVE, Bakersfield CA 93309

Facility 157208851 · RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY (740)

4 bedsLatest official report Apr 22, 2026Licensed

Additional info
Licensee
MISSION SPRINGS, INC.
Administrator
LACADEN, TESS R.
Contact
LACADEN, TESS R.
License first date
May 11, 2018
License effective date
May 11, 2018
District office
FRESNO RO · (559) 243-8080
Regional office
24
Clients served
910 - DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED (DD)

Summary

The available records show 2 Type B deficiencies for this facility.

Most recent inspection
Apr 22, 2026
Most recent deficiency
May 23, 2024

2 later reports, from Jul 1, 2025 through Apr 22, 2026, recorded no deficiencies, though the records do not say whether they were follow-ups.

What Type A and Type B mean
Type A
Violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.
Type B
Violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care.

Both classifications are published by California CDSS and are shown as published. SeniorLivingFacts does not rename them or add a severity level of its own.

At a glance

Counts cover the five-year public record. Typical figures are the median for the 125 Kern County facilities licensed for 6 or fewer beds.

In the available public five-year record, CCLD published 4 reports for this facility: 4 inspections, 0 complaint investigations, and 0 licensing or administrative records.

Those records contain 0 Type A and 2 Type B deficiencies.

1 deficiencies have explicit official correction or clearance evidence in the loaded records.

Official inspections
4

Fewer than the typical 5

1 in the last 12 months

Recorded deficiencies
2

Fewer than the typical 3

0 in the last 12 months

Type A deficiencies
0

Fewer than the typical 1

0 in the last 12 months

Type B deficiencies
2

About the same as most this size

0 in the last 12 months

Substantiated complaints
0

Most this size also have none

0 in the last 12 months

Repeated topics
0

Last 36 months

Repeated topics

Topics cited in more than one report during the last 36 months. A repeat may show a pattern worth asking about. Each date opens its report below.

No topic repeats in the last 36 months

No deficiency topic appears in more than one report during that window. This does not establish that nothing repeated earlier in the five-year record, and it is not a statement about current conditions.

Official report history

All preserved reports from the most recent to the oldest, sortable by report type.

Inspection
Fire safety and emergency preparednessType B
Official classification
Type B
Official code
1569.695(a)
Regulation authority
HSC

What the official deficiency says

(a)In addition to any other requirement of this chapter, a residential care facility for the elderly shall have an emergency and disaster plan that shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Deficient Practice Statement Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in the facility does not have a current updated Emergency Disaster Plan 610E, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Official plan of correction

POC Due Date: 06/06/2024 Plan of Correction Administrator will send current updated LIC 610E, Emergency Disaster Plan to LPA Hurt by 06/06/202 POC date

Plan of correction recorded
Correction not verified in available records
View official report
Inspection
Health conditions and treatmentsType B
Official classification
Type B
Official code
87608(a)(5)(B)
Regulation authority
CCR

What the official deficiency says

87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that appraisal, the facility shall provide assistance and care for the resident in those activities of daily living which the resident is unable to do for himself/herself. Postural supports may be used under the following conditions. (5) Under no circumstances shall postural supports include tying, depriving, or limiting the use of a resident's hands or feet. (B) Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited except for residents who are currently receiving hospice care and have a hospice care plan that specifies the need for full bed rails. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Deficient Practice Statement Based on observations, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. R1's bed was observed with a one side padded full length bed rail and there was no proof of a doctor’s order for a padded full length bed rail, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Official plan of correction

POC Due Date: 05/31/2022 Plan of Correction Licensee removed the padded full length bed rail bed and replaced R1's bed with one without the padded bed rail. POC cleared during the inspection.

Official record says corrected or clearedRecorded in report dated May 31, 2022
Plan of correction recorded
View official report

Source and limits

California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. Public facility history is described by the source as a five-year window. Older records and previous-licensee history may require a regional-office request. Type 741 RCFE-CCRCs, nursing homes, and other care settings are excluded from this page.

Read the data methodology